Petition to Have the State Audit Carl Junction

May 24, 2010

I haven’t heard much lately about this so I don’t know how hard the petition to have the city is being pushed out there. No one’s asked me to sign and I haven’t seen anyone out looking for signatures. Just the same I decided to do a little research when told I had my facts wrong about what the audit would entail. I was in deed wrong in assuming it would cover only the same ground that we already do when having an audit. They do look at other things but so far about 90% of every audit report I’ve read has been about finances and that is a duplication and an added expense to the City of Carl Junction. There are other things that they look at and I’m perfectly okay with that. In fact I have a proposal. I think it’s such a great idea that the State do an audit why don’t we ask the legislature to amend the current law. As I understand in my reading thus far there is no provision that would allow the city to ask for an audit. It is done by petition or if asked for by the Governor. What would be so wrong in giving the city the opportunity to hire the State every few years to do an audit? Right now it is assumed that if the State is doing an audit it must be because there’s something underhanded going on. Why does that have to be? The State is putting the city in a bad position in the current scheme, not to mention costing the taxpayers money when a city like Carl Junction already pays for an annual audit. If the State were to allow the city to just hire them every few years we could do that in lieu of our normal annual audit. This would assure that the city is staying current with the laws of the State of Missouri and do so without having to have suspision from its citizens and the extra cost of duplication that the State audit brings to the city currently. I’m not at all worried about the State finding anything wrong with how things have been done in Carl Junction. We have our finances audited every year already and have been doing so for at least as long as I’ve been an Alderman in Carl Junction. I also fully expect they would have suggestions as to how we can do things better. I see that in many of the reports and they give the City the chance to respond and explain whey they may disagree if needed or to adopt the findings and suggestions that come from the audit.

Positive critique and the chance to make things better is not only smart, its just plain good for everyone.

Thank You

May 22, 2010

Thanks you to all those that turned out this morning for the Long Range Planning Committee Meeting. It may seem sometimes like the city isn’t listening to you but we really do listen and we really want your input. With your help here are just a few things that we’ve seen accomplished since 2003 when I joined the council. Not all of these things even had anything to do directly with the City but they all came from your ideas.

  • Community Center and new Senior Center
  • Sidewalks
  • Approximately 100 new rental properties
  • New police department and court room
  • Walking trails
  • Increase water supply (new wells dug)

I don’t have the sheets in front of me to remind me of any more but you get the idea. Thanks again for being there today and thanks for being part of the process.

Change in Venue for Saturday’s Planning Meeting

May 20, 2010

For any of you that will be able to come to the planning meeting on Saturday morning, we’ve had to change locations. The rain has prevented contractors from getting all the sidewalks poured so we can’t use the new building yet. Instead, we’re going to use the court room at the Police Department Saturday morning. Come meet with us from 9-12 this Saturday, May 22nd and lets talk about the future and how we can be sure that Carl Junction is the desired place to live for a long time to come.

Taken to Task

May 19, 2010

Tonight after a very short council meeting since we didn’t have a quorum I was taken to task, a little bit and in a nice way, about my blog and was told I came across rather arrogant. If that was the perception then I offer my sincere apology as that is not my intent with these blogs. In fact all I’m trying to do is get some of the correct information out there for some that are not getting the answers they need and deserve. However, I will defend myself to this end. I don’t have a problem with people disagreeing with me, in fact I welcome it so long as we can have a civil discourse about our disagreements and be willing to agree to disagree if we can’t find common ground. That said, what has been going on way too much in city council meetings is people throwing out wild allegations, be condescending to the people on the council and city staff and grandstanding to just show off or to try to make the council members look as bad as possible. I’m going to get a bit perturbed when I donate the overwhelming majority of my time (I get paid $21 per council meeting I attend, nothing more) only to have people that have been involved in any of the planning stages then basically come accuse me and the rest of the council of being just about anything and everything except the decent men and women that we are. We’re just there trying to do our best for the entire city of Carl Junction. We’re not always going to make everyone happy. I’m not always happy with the way things go. That’s the process. Live within it or change it.

I’m trying to get more information out there for those that are interested. Help me by toning down the rhetoric and lets work on making Carl Junction the best place to live in the four states. Respond to these posts with questions and suggestions. Be part of the process. I was asked a few months back why we didn’t have more people from the public on the Long Range Planning Committee. The fact is every meeting has been and is wide open to the public. If you’re not part of the process it’s because you’ve chosen not to be, not because there aren’t opportunities for you.

If you’ve got a gripe that’s fine but lets deal in facts rather than conjecture and with a civil tongue from all sides. To that end anyone in Carl Junction is invited to the new building on Saturday morning at 9am where we will go over some of the planning activities we’ve discussed and we’ll give the public, as we’ve done many times in the past, a chance to give input as to how you want Carl Junction to look 20 years from now. By the way, I was reminded tonight that the idea for the new community center was originally conceived in one of these retreats.

Carl Junction Community Center and City Hall

May 6, 2010

There have been some people that have questioned the city about budgets and such and alledged that the city has in some way mislead the people of Carl Junction about the money used to build the new facility that we will be moving into in the next week. I thought I might make a stab at answering some of these questions since I spent considerable time this week researching and familiarizing myself with the history of the events leading up to the vote on the bond issue.

1 – The bond issue language. Here is what was on the ballot.

Question NO.1

Shall the City of Carl Junction, Missouri, issue its general obligation bonds in the amount

of $4,135,000 for the purpose of constructing and equipping a new building to house the

city hall, a senior center and a community center and related improvements?

Question NO.2

Shall the City of Carl Junction, Missouri, issue its general obligation bonds in the amount

of $365,000 for the purpose of improving the streets of the City, including without limitation

Briarbrook Drive?

You will notice that neither of these questions says anything about a budget or that this is the amount that each will cost, just that the citizens were being asked to approve the issuance of bonds in these amounts. This was an extension of a previously approved GO Bond and these were the amounts that could be raised without asking for a tax increase. It had nothing to do with a budget. In fact a budget wasn’t even decided on for at least 6 months or so after the approval of the bond issue. This is because it would have been a waste of taxpayer money to have been working on a building that we couldn’t pay for without the bond issue being passed. This doesn’t mean we didn’t have some money to go toward this, just not enough. Anyone that insists this was the budget just doesn’t understand the process or has refused to be part of the process along the way to see what was being done and just wants to criticize after the fact.

The fact is that 68.45% of the people that voted, voted in favor of Question 1. The fact is that 67.4% of the people that voted, voted in favor of Question 2. If there is anything at all to be upset about it would be the fact that only 681 people voted on the measure.

The ballot language had to cover the costs of building and equipping simply because had we been able to build the building for say $3,000,000 we would have not had the approval to use the bond money for equipping. To make the leap to this constituting a budget is just wrong.

2 – A Storm shelter was never mentioned in the ballot language. The only time this was ever even mentioned in anything that went out to the public was in a flyer from the Citizens For a Better Life. The city can’t campaign for approval of the measure. Not that the city didn’t or doesn’t want one, that’s just the way it happened. We did want to have one and still want to have one but it makes no sense to do that with local taxpayer money when we can do it with FEMA grants. There was no reason to hold off on the construction of the building when we were told it would take as much as a couple of years to get approval of the grant when we would not have been able to start on the rest of the building until that process was completed. There was also no pressing need to go forward with a storm shelter right this minute when we already have one at the Police department that holds up to 200 people and has not been utilized by more than a fraction of that number of people. The Chief of Police in a recent meeting said that no more than about 7 people have used this shelter. Is FEMA likely to grant money any time soon for a new shelter when the existing one isn’t being used?

3 – There has been a lot of talk about doing an audit on the city. I have no problem with that whatsoever if that’s what the people want. However, lets be clear on something. The city is already audited on an annual basis (that means every year). With that in mind what the people that want this are really saying is that they don’t think the firm we use can add and subtract. Otherwise what’s the point? All our accounting is done based on State and Federal law as well as advice from the company that does this annual audit. And if there is a problem with this company then please tell me why the City of Neosho just hired them for the audit of that city?

If these same people that constantly want to criticize about what the city is doing would spend that time and attention working with the city to make it a better place to live we would accomplish a lot more, and with their assistance probably accomplish it at a lower cost to the citizenry of Carl Junction. My real question is will these people be brave enough to step forward and be part of the planning process when we hold an open meeting on May 22nd at the new building, or will they be content to let others do the work for them then just wait for the opportunity to criticize from afar.

Oh How I Hate the Transition from Winter to Spring

March 16, 2010

I’ve never suffered with depression like some do but I think I can relate, at least a little. It seems that every year as winter tries it’s best to hold on but spring wants to bust out that I reach a point, for at least a couple of days, where I could care less about anything. I’d be happy to just stay in bed. No one has done anything to me, nothing traumatic has taken place, it just seems that there’s something about this transition every year that puts me in a real weird place where although I know I have ton’s to do, I just really don’t care.

It was especially bad the 2 years we lived in New Zealand because in Hamilton where we lived it was rather mild anyway so it seemed to literally take months to move from winter to spring. On the other hand, I dont’ remember ever really having the feeling for more than a day or 2 in Louisiana where I grew up. I think that’s because it could be 80 degrees one day and 40 the next from about Thanksgiving to March so there was no definite winter really. Here in Missouri we just had 4 or 5 days of really nice warm weather followed by cold overcast days. Maybe that’s what set it off.

Time to snap out of it though. Lots to do today before I travel to south Texas tomorrow. Hopefully it will be nice and toasty there and I’ll be able to gripe about how hot it is.

Find Your Ideal Home With Our Free MLS Search Engine! Look at Joplin, Carl Junction, Webb City and More! This is the Best way to shop for properties in SW Missouri!

Click Here For Free MLS Access… JoplinHomeSales.com

Walter & Ginger Hayes of The Hayes Team

Keller Williams Realty of Southwest Missouri

619 S Florida

Joplin, MO 64801

Office: (417) 623-9900

Walter: (417) 649-6776

Ginger: (417) 291-0734

Fax: (512) 519-7578

E-Mail: walter@walterhayes.com or ginger@gingerhayes.com

Gambinos Pizza

March 13, 2010

They say it’s best to write about that which you know and considering I’m a lot heavier than I should be, food, good food is one of those things that I know a little something about. I’m going to write from time to time about some of the different places and people of Carl Junction and tonight is food night, particularly pizza.

Forget the big chains out there, for me the best pizza I can get on a night to night, and did for that matter, is a Pepperoni Lover’s pizza on the traditional crust from Gambinos here in Carl Junction. I know there are others out there, some more popular and some less expensive but Gambinos pizza has been my favorite for a long, long time now. My wife doesn’t agree with me on this one but she still induldges me. I hear that the new Italian place in town has good pizza too so I guess we’ll have to try that out sometime soon.

The Briarbrook CID question

March 3, 2010

Man am I glad that this week’s City Council meeting in Carl Junction is over. This whole CID thing has gone way beyond the bizarre. I couldn’t believe what I was hearing tonight when a citizen got up and compared the City Council’s consideration of the CID ordinance to what is happening in Washington with the Democrats pushing a healthcare bill through that a majority of the people don’t want. The fact of the matter is that this is exactly what the opposition has been doing. Consider for a moment if you will. The vote on a bond to purchase the Briarbrook property last April was just that, a vote to authorize the City to borrow money so it could purchase the property. It was at no time listed or advertised as a vote on Briarbrook itself. However since the opposition has wanted to use it in that context let’s do so. The fact is that a majority of the citizens of Carl Junction and an overwhelming majority of those in Ward 3 (the Briarbrook area) voted in FAVOR of the proposed bond. Since then a majority of Ward 3 have signed a petition asking for the formation of the CID. Yet the opposition has wanted the council to disregard the will of the people of Ward 3 in favor of their position and when that hasn’t happen they have tried just about every childish trick imaginable. The same person who addressed the Council on at least 2 occasions complaining about how she was being treated so badly by her neighbors through all this had the nerve to cross examine the City Clerk and treat her very badly in a public setting. It was shameful according to reports and tonight we’re told how she has been putting so much pressure on neighbors that they didn’t want her to know if they signed the petition or not.

The people of Ward 3 as a majority wanted this to happen. The ordinance is now passed. Let it lie or help make it work. Quit being such a sore loser. It’s not very becoming.

Find Your Ideal Home With Our Free MLS Search Engine! Look at Joplin, Carl Junction, Webb City and More! This is the Best way to shop for properties in SW Missouri!

Click Here For Free MLS Access… JoplinHomeSales.com

Walter & Ginger Hayes of The Hayes Team

Keller Williams Realty of Southwest Missouri

619 S Florida

Joplin, MO 64801

Office: (417) 623-9900

Walter: (417) 649-6776

Ginger: (417) 291-0734

Fax: (512) 519-7578

E-Mail: walter@walterhayes.com or ginger@gingerhayes.com

Briarbrook

February 3, 2010

In the City Council meeting of February 2nd 2010 I made some statements concerning the CID proposed for Ward 3 in Carl Junction. I wanted to recap them here.

First is that I clarified or corrected a persistent myth that has been going around Carl Junction for some time and has often been used by those in opposition to the CID. They keep telling people and even telling the Council that the vote in April of last year was a vote on Briarbrook and that it failed. This is simply not factual. The vote last year was about whether the City of Carl Junction should borrow money to buy the Briarbrook property. It got about a 52% vote in favor but lacked the 57% super majority vote required by the State. So what failed was authorization for the City to borrow money, nothing more. If people insist on making this a vote on Briarbrook then their take should be completely different. There was a majority of the people in favor, not opposed.

The second thing I commented on was that I’m concerned about the property values, and more importantly, how the property assessments for the City have been and will continue to be impacted by the state of flux created since Steve Hays first started talking about closing the course and selling the land off for residential development. I found in looking at MLS statistics for Briarbrook and the Carl Junction area that new home sales had fallen by 71% in 2008 and 85% in 2009 compared to where they were in 2007 for Briarbrook. This is against a back drop of a 7% to 8% drop in sales for all of the Carl Junction area for the same time period. If growth in Carl Junction stops, assessments will only go up at most as much as the appreciation rate experienced rather than the large increases in assessments that have been the norm for most of the last 10 years. If assessment values don’t go up, the tax levy that the City charges will either be flat or will go up in order to cover the operating expenses of the City. The fact is that we’ve already seen the effects of this. When I took office in 2003 the owner of a $100,000 home in Carl Junction was paying $143.36 to the City in property taxes. By 2007 that had fallen to $131.10. This past August we had to raise the levy back up because of how little assessments had changed and the owner of that $100,000 home had to pay $140.16 to the City in the way of property taxes. If the Briarbrook issue is not settled I know this trend will continue. If the CID doesn’t become reality and the Briarbrook golf course and other ammenities closes I don’t know what the impact will be for sure but I expect that the growth of the city will slow and assessments will stay flat as well meaning that there would be the chance that the levy would have to be raised again next year raising your taxes potentially by as much or more than what the CID will cost.

Lastly, I’ve been very consistent in that I’d have preferred this to be voted on rather than done by petition. My belief is that it would pass by much more than the 52% that have signed the petition in Ward 3 but a vote would still be my preference. That said, there has been ample time for those opposing the CID to petition for a vote or take other steps but that hasn’t been done. What has happened is that 52% of those living in Ward 3 have signed the petition as required by State law to have the CID formed. That 52% of the people in Ward 3 represents 56% of the assessed value of Ward 3. I am not about to vote against them.

Sincerely,

Walter Hayes IV

Alderman Ward 2

Carl Junction, MO 64834

Walter Hayes – What I Believe

December 10, 2009

There have been some around town that do not know just what I stand for and my question why I respond the way I do on some things that come to the City Council. One thing you should know is that at the City level, at least at this point in history, we have a council devoid of personal agendas. It has happened in the past, even while I’ve been an alderman but I’d say at least for the last 3 to 4 years we haven’t had a problem with this. Not that we haven’t had problems, just that we’ve had a council that works together and seeks to do what is best for the City of Carl Junction.

There are many things about this country that are great but there are also many things that are seriously wrong in this country and what follows is what I believe is needed to address those problems. They are listed in no particular order other than how they happen to come to mind. If there is a candidate that is brave enough to adopt what I have here they can count me in on their team.

1.    Foreign Aid – The United States is one of the most giving nations on earth, both from the government and the public at large. It is high time however, that we stop using tax dollars to try to win the favor of other countries. We should immediately withdraw all aid to foreign nations and use that money to bring down the huge deficit that we are faced with. The only exception that I would even think of is the aid that we send to Israel. They are our best friend and it is crucial to our National security that they are successful.

2.    Israel – We should formally declare our unwavering support for the State of Israel and their right to the land that they paid for (according to Golda Meir) when the State of Israel was reformed in 1948 and have bled and died to protect ever since. It is not a Palestinian state. It is the State of Israel and there will be no peace so long as we try to play both sides of the fence.

3.    Nuclear Proliferation – We cannot as a country afford to let nuts like we have running Iran, Venezuela and other countries have access to Nuclear weapons. They simply do not have the common sense to use those weapons as deterrents. They want the weapons because they want to use the weapons.

4.    Military Personnel – The way we have treated the military of this country is reprehensible. I would immediately remove any political input from the fighting of wars or actions that we send our military into. I would also ensure that our military have the absolute best equipment and supplies available on the face of the earth to do the task that we have asked them to.

5.    Foreign Military Bases – I would immediately close the military bases anywhere in the world where we are not wanted. On the way out though I’d also tell that government that my phone number has been disconnected and not to call me in a crisis asking for help.

6.    Military Retirement and Health Care – Our Military men and women are treated like sub class human beings in this country rather then the heroes that they are.  I would immediately make it such that a military retiree that has given his 20 years minimum  in the defense of his country has a minimum of One Million dollars in retirement proceeds from which to retire in a style more suitable for those that have given their utmost for their country. Furthermore I would ensure that any active duty military killed in the line of duty has a minimum of a 2 million payment made as a death benefit to their estate so that the loved ones they leave behind can be taken care of and not worry about being destitute. It is the least we can do as a country. Any active duty or veteran should also have access to the best medical care available in the United States at the local level rather than having to rely on veteran’s hospitals. If anyone in this country deserves free health care, it’s our military men and women.

7.    Taxes – I would immediately scrap the IRS and any tax that penalizes the creation of wealth it is the exact opposite of what we should be doing in a free enterprise, capitalistic society. It would replace all taxes based on income with the Fair tax as outlined by Neil Boortz. This is the on fair tax there is. Those that are poor would not pay one penny more tax than they do today, which is $0 to start with. It would eliminate the temptation for businesses of any sort to keep a set of books for tax purposes and a set for the banks to see. It would also truly put the taxation of people in this country into the mode that some have always said they were trying to do. Those with more spend more; hence they would pay more in taxes. All the politicians that talk against this now do so because the fair tax would make them actually have to start paying taxes. This is because, and any business person knows this, a business pays taxes on what’s left after the income has come in and they’ve paid all the bills associated with running that business. You and I pay taxes on our income before any bills are paid. We are always going to pay more than a business person and the politicians know this.

8.    Welfare – this is needed for the temporary restoration of those that are less fortunate than others. However, we are guaranteed the right to the “Pursuit of happiness” not the right to happiness. Therefore anyone on welfare should either be working on jobs supplied by the government to earn their keep until they can find something better or be sent to school at the expense of the government to learn a trade that will keep them off of Welfare in the future. We should not be enslaving people to the system making it virtually impossible to escape welfare as we do today.

9.    Death Penalty – I absolutely believe in the death penalty as a deterrent to violent crimes. I’ve never seen someone executed come back and kill someone else. However, we should adopt the biblical principal that says that the only way the death penalty can be used is if there are 2 eyewitnesses to the crime. This might be people or it might be incontrovertible forensic evidence but any less requires a maximum of life in prison.

10.    Justice System – the idea of circumstantial evidence should be stricken from the lexicon of the American legal system. One should never be allowed to be put in prison without direct evidence tying that person to the supposed crime.

11.    Economy – The economy should be left to the market it doesn’t need the government meddling in it. One thing that should be abolished is any reference to consumer confidence or other similar indicators. The current recession was not caused by wall-street or the real estate crash or anything of the sort. The current recession was caused by a political party and the media that serves them convincing the American people that the sky was falling despite all the indicators to the contrary. Everything that has happened since then was a direct result of the people going into a panic as both consumers and creditors. I would look at going back to some form of the Gold Standard. Our money needs to be backed by more than the supposed good faith of the Federal Government.

12.    Health Care – socialized health care only guarantees that you don’t get good health care. It’s an experiment that has already failed every where it’s been tried so the old adage about what do you call someone that keeps doing the same thing expecting a different result comes to mind. There are not 50 million people in this country without health care that are crying to get health care. That number includes illegal immigrants, those that make enough money that they don’t want or need insurance and those that are too young to think that they need insurance. The easiest way to significantly reduce costs is simple.

a.    I would immediately seek to repeal any and all laws that have forced insurance companies into a position where they can’t compete, just like the government has done to the oil industry.

b.    Allow groups to cross state lines. The larger the insurance group the lower and more stable the insurance cost.

c.    Put caps on lawsuits against doctors. We cannot afford to run good doctors out of business because of sometimes frivolous lawsuits. If a crime isn’t broken, judgements should be capped.

d.    Outlaw any and all attempts to get between your doctor and your health care.

e.    Incentivize in some form or fashion the coverage of preventive care rather than just treatment. For example: I’m on a medically supervised diet in an attempt to lose close to 100 pounds. My insurance will not pay for any of the doctor visits involved in this attempt. They would rather pay for the 6 medications I’m on or bypass surgery at some point than preventing any of that from happening.

13.    Abortion – The scourge of America. Abortion is the taking of a human life by another human pure and simple. Debate it all you want but that’s what it is and if you say that abortion is legal then euthanasia is legal and then how can you say that any other form of killing is illegal. Abortion should be banned, immediately and any doctor that performs an abortion should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. At a minimum the same test to take someone off of life support should be used to determine the viability of a fetus. Run a EEG to detect brain waves. If brain waves are being generated then that life cannot be taken. The argument about the back alley abortions is dribble put out by people trying to scare other people. There is this thing called birth control that wasn’t as well known or as generally accepted in the 1970s as it is today. Today someone in grade school can get a condom without telling a parent but I have to have an act of Congress for that same child to take an aspirin or prescribed medication.

14.    The Environment – I would immediately roll back all environmental laws in this country that are not backed by proven science, not a poll of scientists, but proven scientists. One of the things that troubles me most is the scientific community hasn’t changed in 1000 years. They wanted to kill those that said that the earth was round and that the sun was the center of our galaxy in times past. Today the popular (where the money is) scientific thought has given us evolution and global warming, neither of which can be proven and modeled. Climate change is as natural as breathing. I’m pretty sure that the vast deserts of the world use to be covered with water. Why aren’t we trying to restore them to their natural state? Evolution and Global Warming are religions to some but to most are a way to make a lot of money, no more, no les and there is no reason to wreck our economy over it.

15.    Separation of Church and State – this doesn’t exist in the Constitution anywhere and should be abolished. The Constitution only says that the State is not to promote or establish a national religion. The very fact that Separation of Church and State has come into existence violates the constitution as trying to remove any reference to God or Christianity from our history, schools and government only serves to promote the religion of Atheism.

16.    Energy Independence – Getting the handle on energy independence isn’t the least bit difficult if the politicians would just get out of the way. Here’s what needs to be done.

a.    Repeal all laws that prohibit refiners from seeking the best price when buying oil to process. When I was working for the Texaco system in a joint venture with Saudi Aramco we could have gotten oil from the Saudi’s at up 1/3 the market price but we were prohibited from doing so as that would have given us an unfair advantage over the competition if we put gasoline out there a lot cheaper than the competition. Or it would of made us more of a profit and of course we can’t have that.

b.    Create a distribution network for alternative fuels such as Ethanol, H2, Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) and Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG). When I live in New Zealand every gas station has gasoline, diesel along with CNG and LPG. We have so much natural gas (leaving the politicians aside for a moment) that we spent most of the 70s drilling and capping gas wells all over Louisiana and Texas.

c.    Drill, drill, drill -we should be drilling for oil in our country wherever it is available. Anyone that thinks that we are going to free ourselves from petroleum any time soon needs to be drug tested. You can get through the next 5 minutes without touching something or using something that required petroleum (oil for you that petroleum is too big a word for) to produce. It’s insane to insist on importing oil from elsewhere and pay people a handsome profit for it when a lot of those people don’t like us.

d.    Build more refinery capacity – We haven’t built a new refinery in over 30 years in the US. Most people only think we import oil. The fact is we import a lot of the gas and diesel that we use in this country and there’s absolutely no reason for it.

e.    Use wind and solar wherever possible. It’s there for the using so let’s use it to the greatest extent possible. Solar needs to be affordable enough that it becomes common place to equip new residential housing with it from the outset.

f.    There is no reason not to take advantage of Nuclear. Europe has used it very effectively for years. This is the one place that it makes sense to emulate them.

g.    Make LED lighting the norm and bypass CFL lighting. It’s ridiculous to use CFL if it just creates a hazardous waste when LED saves more money on energy and last longer the CFL.

There are other things I’m sure that could and should be here but this is just the start of what I think should be done in regards to some of the most pressing issues of our day.

Walter E. Hayes IV
610 Hayes Ave.
Carl Junction MO 64834


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.